Fashion in World War I: May 1916

Three suits by Chanel in silk and wool jersey

The second issue of Les Elégances Parisiennes opened with a revealing discussion of the difficulties facing the French fashion industry in wartime. The Lyon trade fair for fashion trades the previous month had been a huge success, with large orders placed by Allied buyers for goods ranging from decorative hair combs to silk fabrics. But the execution of these orders might prove problematic with materials in short supply. A corset manufacturer had received enough orders to keep them busy for three years – IF the government allocated them enough steel to make stiffenings and fastenings. There was a lengthy article criticising the actions of the Société Suisse de Surveillance Economique;  French manufacturers were sending goods to neutral Switzerland only to find that they were re-exported to hostile Germany and Austria. Underlying the paranoia in accounts of German salesmen being allowed home from the war in order to carry out industrial espionage was a justifiable anxiety about the shortcomings of French business practices. How was it that German firms had been able to undersell French producers, even in the French colonies?

After the closely-printed pages of industry news came an illustrated account of the latest fashions, apparently adressed to couture clients. It is not clear how the different sections of the publication were intended to be used, but it is noteworthy that the coloured plates and illustrated articles could be detached for separate distribution. The fashion trends discussed continued to follow two divergent paths. One of them consisted of lavish formal gowns with wide skirts made wider by frills and draperies. These were ideal for displaying the rich fabrics and embroideries and delicate laces produced by French firms, and the plate captions give precise ordering details for the textiles used. These styles would also require the latest underpinnings, including corsets with rounded hips and petticoats stiffened with hoops, and matching accessories such as shoes and mantles. The thoroughness of seasonal changes was what made the fashion industry so important in driving consumption, even in wartime.

Opposed to the high fashion of the established couture houses like Worth, Paquin and Chéruit were the more informal clothes being offered by smaller firms. Gabrielle Chanel was gaining recognition for her casual ensembles made from wool and silk jersey, described as ‘ideal for cruises or for the countryside’. The three illustrated here show that she was expanding her range, offering a version in khaki wool with a patch-pocketed jacket based on military uniform, and a more feminine ensemble in violet silk trimmed with bands of velvet. It was this ability to vary a successful formula that would prove crucial to her success.

Three evening wraps showcasing French silk brocades and embroideries

Posted in Fashion, Fashion in World War I | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fashion in World War I: April 1916

Dresses by Lanvin with 'peasant' blouses, Elegances Parisiennes

In April 1916, the first issue of Les Elegances Parisiennes appeared, incorporating some of the journalists and features from Le Style Parisien, but with stronger links to French couture and luxury textile trades. The contents were an uneasy mixture of fashion reportage, in illustrated articles aimed at couture clients, advertorial, with fashion plates detailing the latest cuts and textiles, and trade news. A lengthy article by M. Kempf, President of the Délégation des Industries Créatrices de la Mode spelled out what he saw as the main threats facing the French fashion trade during wartime. He did not mention the loss of overseas clients owing to travel restrictions, which the New York ‘Fete Parisienne’ had been at pains to address a few months earlier. Nor did he mention the difficulties of accessing raw materials and skilled labour when French industry had been placed on a war footing. Instead, he identified areas in which he felt French trade had been undermined by German initiatives, claiming that :

Before the war, most of the shipping agencies for the international market and especially Russia were German. I will not suprise anyone if I add that these agencies were involved in organised industrial espionnage, sending back information about our most successful exports.

He highlighted the need for French organisations to step in and replace German-sponsored events like the Leipzig textile trade fair, and called for the French postal service to improve its international shipping rates. Leaving aside the element of paranoia, this passage is interesting for the picture it presents of a pan-European fashion trade connecting manufacturers, middlemen and consumers from Paris to St Petersburg.

The styles in this issue of Elegances Parisiennes showed the prevailing trend was an 1830s revival, with sloping shoulders, balloon sleeves, fitted waists, and wide ankle-length skirts.  This was sometimes varied with references to the seventeenth-century Spanish styles seen in the paintings of Velaquez, such as wide lace collars and hooped skirts.  In this atmosphere of Romantic revivalism, the simple shift dresses of Paul Poiret looked anomalous – they were illustrated but not commented on. Within this consensus, there were styles aimed at very different markets. There were evening dresses lavished with silver lace and beaded embellishment from established couture houses like Worth and Beer; these would be of limited use in Paris, where formal evening events were now rare. But there were also simpler or multi-functional ensembles, such as wool suits with fancy silk blouses that could be worn both for shopping and at daytime socials, designed by younger firms like Jenny and Lanvin. The fashion columnist Martine Renier summed up these differences as:

‘Fashion for Allied countries – subdued tailoring and simple little dresses – and fashion for Neutral countries – rich, elegant, and refined – which we send out around the world, shining as brightly as our hopes.’

Poiret shift dress, Elegances Parisiennes

Posted in Fashion, Fashion in World War I, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fashion in World War I: March 1916

Trying out fashionable fabrics for the new 'Marie Antoinette' styles

For March 1916, we return to American Vogue, where the war was seen as having a broadly positive effect on the fashion industry. An article with the long-winded title  ‘The Warp and Woof of Spring: France is producing some of the most Interesting Fabrics Which Ever Came from Her Looms, and America Comes Forward with Some Prodigies of Her Infant industry’ highlighted recent advances in American textile manufacturing. The anonymous author begun with a picture of the relationship between textiles and culture to delight a textile historian like myself:

From bits of the materials woven in the various countries during the different ages, even those uninitiated in the study of textiles can read an intelligible story….The materials which to-day are scattered over the counters in the shops of Fifth Avenue or which hang on the little brass hooks in the pretty salons of the dressmakers, are all part of this great story in textiles and they, like the materials of long ago, speak of things more important than their own beauty or charm. This gay silk which a vivacious matron has just chosen for an evening frock will, a thousand years from now…give mute testimony to the fortitude of France under the stress of a great war; that soft stuff which a brown-haired debutante has just decided upon for a new skating costume may prove to some bespectacled student in the future that in the year 1916 there was at least one mill in America which wove wool materials as fine as any in the world

This emphasis on fashionable fabrics, reminds us that in 1916 Vogue readers might be having garments made by small dressmakers, or even at home. This early March issue of presented the new season’s range of dressmaking patterns, a major aspect of the magazine’s success; they might be used by professionals as well as amateurs for information on the latest cut.

Alongside the rich silk brocades and metallic laces recommended for evening gowns, and light foulards and taffetas for summer frocks, Vogue also noted the continued importance of wool jersey. This had first been mentioned in February 1915, as a novel fabric for casual jackets worn at the seaside resorts of Deauville and Monte Carlo. By March 1916 jersey was being made into dresses and suits – as Le Style Parisien had noted – and one designer in particular was specialising in these chic but comfortable garments:

One see modest tailored frocks of more or less familiar shape, muslin gowns under fur-trimmed coats of jersey, and smart suits of jersey combined with cloth or silk; and each one, to the knowing eye, is labelled large, ‘Chanel’.

A Chanel suit in white jersey trimmed in green for Spring 1916

Posted in Fashion, Fashion in World War I, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Fashion in World War I: February 1916

Dresses with separate jackets and blouses, February 1916

In February 1916, Le Style Parisien issued its final number. In a statement to its subscribers, it clarified that this was for moral reasons as much as for economic ones. It had aimed to create a publication that would speak for French couture houses, and defend them against Austrian and German competitors, but were not alone in this field:

Hachette publishing house has this same aim and a similar ambition and we therefore thought that we it was right for the two organisations to unite. Therefore, Le Style Parisien will merge with Les Elegances Parisiennes, the official organ of the ‘Delegation of the creative industries of fashion’.

This elision between economic and nationalistic motivations can be seen throughout the journal, and helps to explain some of the odd discrepancies in tone between and even within editorial articles. In this final issue, the ‘Lettre d’une Parisienne’ opens by welcoming the new trend for ‘pelerine’ capelets and bolero jackets, which can be made in different materials to match or contrast with a dress, creating several outfits at a minimal price.  The implication is that these unfitted over-garments could be made by a less skilled dressmaker, bypassing the professionals. The latest trends in trimmings include fancy ribbons, recommended for sashes and neckties to freshen up the wardrobe at little expense.

Yet elsewhere in the same article there is an interview with a specialist boot-maker, M. Genera, who worked for Jenny and other couture houses. He describes his new season’s range of fancy boots in satin and patent leather for wear with indoor dresses, rather than the more usual pumps. It is clear that the trend for shorter skirts, and wartime restrictions on the use of carriages and motor cars, would make boots more practical. But M. Genera is careful to distance himself from mass-market trends, claiming that:

Boots are harder to make well, and the cheap imitations are awful. Anyone can make a good pair of shoes but not everyone can make a smart pair of boots. Really fashionable women know this, and will only give up boots when long narrow skirts return.

This tension between the need of the consumers for affordable and wearable wardrobe solutions, and the desire of couturiers to maintain their exclusivity and high standards of workmanship, was central to the fashion industry in 1916 – and remains so today.

Ribbon sashes to update dresses, February 1916

Posted in Fashion, Fashion in World War I | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fashion in World War I: January 2016

A white 'djersette' dress with embroidery for Spring 1916

The January 1916 edition of ‘Le Style Parisien’ promoted some new trends for the coming season, including some innovative fashion fabrics produced by the leading French manufacturers. There were silks sold with lines of toning braid or fringing stitched on, ready to be made up. This would increase the cost of the fabric – and might help to sell French products in the all-important American market. However the trend for added trimmings had a down side, which was that cash-strapped consumers could add them to a home-made ensemble, bypassing fashion professionals.

The second trend in fashion fabrics was a new product by Rodier, ‘djersette’, which combined the fluidity and ‘give’ of wool jersey with the stability of woven wool. This development was a back-handed acknowledgement of the increased dominance of jersey fabrics, already noted in May 1915, which threatened the position of Rodier and other specialists in woven silks. The wartime use of knitwear laid the foundations for the simpler fashions of the 1920s – and established the reputation of Coco Chanel, one of the leaders of the trend.

‘Le Style Parisien’ also noted a Paris premiere by Diaghilev’s Ballets Russes, Soleil de Nuit with choreography by Leonide Massine and designs by Mikhail Larionov based on Russian peasant costumes. Diaghilev’s productions since 1908 had been instrumental in popularizing striking colour schemes and exotic décor in fashion and interiors.  However  at this premiere, the most fashionable women wore black, a mark of the changed mood of Paris fashion since the outbreak of war.

Fashionable silk ribbons for Spring 1916

Posted in Fashion, Fashion in World War I | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fashion in World War I: December 1915

Dresses shown at the Fete Parisienne in New York, from Le Style Parisien

The ‘Fete Parisienne’ of couture fashion in New York generated welcome publicity for Paris couturiers – and funds for French orphanages. But it also highlighted some of the tensions between French couture houses which originated designs and American wholesalers and retailers. Under war conditions, American private clients were less able to travel to Paris and thus were dependent on middlemen who could bring Paris styles to them. A lengthy editorial in ‘Le Style Parisien’ enumerated the many ways in which these middlemen were exploiting their access to couture showrooms. In addition to the long-standing practices of clandestine sketching, snipping of fabric samples, and bribing couture workshop staff to obtain information, there were some larger-scale abuses. Some middlemen purchased couture garments (after beating down the price) only to copy or adapt them for the mass market. Some allowed American manufacturers to adapt Paris originals in return for the purchase of trimmings sold by the middlemen.

Most damaging to the reputation of French couture was the way in which middlemen were setting themselves up as arbiters of fashion, daring to dictate to couture houses about the length of skirts, or the degree of decoration. Worst of all, they were presenting their copies, rip-offs, and misinterpretations of French styles as Paris originals to unsuspecting American consumers:

‘We didn’t bring back anything from Lanvin, there’s nothing new there. We’ve found something much better from a little house with some amazing ideas’ – a house which they have set up to reproduce their own fakes.

These deep undercurrents in the couture trade also created surface ripples; an article in ‘Le Style Parisien’ addressed to consumers of fashion admitted that the current trend was to simplify the wardrobe: ‘The woman who is not able, for reasons of health or unsuitability, to volunteer as a nurse, can make many savings in her dress budget while remaining elegant, as she will have no need for evening gowns or wraps’. The new simplicity in dress was given a modern edge by a greater use of cosmetics, with Duvelleroy, manufacturer of luxury bags and accessories, bringing out a make-up purse that could be shown off in public.

Another type of accessory fashionable in France was jewellery made as miniatures  of military equipment: not only regimental cap badges, but airplanes, cannons, and bullets, reproduced by Cartier in gold and diamonds. This was explained by American Vogue as:  ‘Symbols, to stand as the visible and outward expression of what the heart feels so keenly, have become essential, symbols of such intrinsic value as themselves to be worthy  of what they represent.’ And if jeweled cannons seemed to trivialise the conflict, there was the option of a bangle made from polished sections of shell casing, sold in aid of a war charity.

Posted in Fashion, Fashion in World War I, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fashion in World War I: November 1915

Couture textiles by Bianchini Ferier of Lyon (Le Style Parisien)

The big fashion story of November 1915 was the ‘Fete Parisienne’ organised in New York by the ‘Syndicat de Defense de la Couture Parisienne’. Its centrepiece was a short play by Roger Boutet de Monvel with a scenario that explicitly addressed French couturiers’ dependence on American clients to pay their workers, the ‘midinettes’. The hundred couture ensembles presented in the play and in related other events were carefully chosen to follow the fashionable lines established the previous season – this was to avoid both clients and wholesalers rejecting them. Immediately after the opening of the ’Fete’ on 23 November Women’s Wear Daily, the newspaper of the American garment industry, announced ‘Ritz-Carlton Fashion Fete A Success As An Exhibition And Advertising Coup: Showing Regarded As The First Move By New Syndicate —Draws Good Crowd—Display Shows Nothing Radically New In Line, But Much In Detail — Many Beautiful Models And Materials In Exhibit’.

However WWD also reported on actions of the Syndicat which were designed to make life difficult for American retailers and manufacturers: buyers would have to be vetted before attending couture shows, and would be prosecuted for unauthorised sketching, or even for taking notes that could be turned into sketches later! Le Style Parisien explained that the Syndicat had three aims :  ‘a fight to the death’ against the infiltration of the French fashion industry by foreign firms; a fight against the incursion of foreign workers; and a fight against copying or counterfeiting of their members’ designs, and ‘disloyal competition.’ The aggressive language of the Syndicat helps to explain the ambivalent reaction to the ‘Fete Parisienne’ from the American fashion industry.

A shooting outfit by Abercrombie and Fitch (Vogue, November 1915)

New York Vogue seems to have hedged its bets, giving detailed accounts of the French styles but also reporting on a theatre show promoting American fashion – including sportswear by Abercrombie and Fitch!  They also advised their readers on how to cut corners by getting local dressmakers to run up  simple garments like evening wraps in striking fabrics that gave the effect of Paris fashions for a much lower cost.

A home-made evening wrap imitating Poiret (Vogue, November 1911)

Evening dress and coat by Poiret shown in 'La Fete Parisienne' (Le Style Parisien)

Posted in Fashion, Fashion in World War I | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fashion in World War I: October 1915

Breton styled dresses by Beer, Jenny and Paquin, October 1915, Pl.VII:

In the October issue of ‘Le Style Parisien’, a columnist philosophized on the political resonances of the new season’s fashions. She made a contrast with the styles of 1815, which drew freely from the uniforms of opposing armies – Hussars, Uhlans, and even the perfidious English. She admitted that the beginning of the current war had seen the widespread adoption of garments such as ‘military-style tailored suits, with khaki or army blue overcoats’ – but that these have ‘completely disappeared from the winter collections’. She attributed this change in approach to a greater awareness both of the grim reality of war, and of the political allegiances that supported France:

Now war is too horrible, thanks to those who wished it on us, for us to use it as a source for subversive demonstrations of the kind that happened under Napoleon: then, the style leaders and their followers were anglophiles who wore ‘riding coats’ and top hats even as their Emperor was dreaming up ways to invade Britain. Now, our loyalty and our alliances inspire our couturiers; the researcher of a century from now, leafing through today’s fashion journals, will find nothing but styles called ‘Victory’, ‘Tipperary’, ‘Serbia’ or ‘Moujik’.[p20; my translation]

French couturiers were looking to local traditions rather than to exotic warriors for inspiration, with dresses based on the costumes of Breton or Alsatian peasants.

The columnist also noted a shift in female deportment: some couturiers had tired of the loose-waisted, sacklike silhouette of recent months and had tried to revive the curvy, small-waisted figure fashionable in 1905. However this had not been a success, as the hourglass figure now looked ‘hideous, unhealthy and out-dated’. The current ideal of beauty was feminine but neat and ready for action, a striking contrast from the slinky vamps of prewar years:

mannequin ne s’envolent sous nos yeux ahuris. in the days – which seem so long ago now –  when skirts were narrow, models swayed along, very slowly, one foot dragged reluctantly after the other; they had a langourous, feline gait, with swaying shoulders and hooded gaze like tango dancers. Nowadays things have completely changed : a spruce, coquettish little woman bounds along the catwalk, then suddenly stops, spinning like a top to right and left so that her skirt swings like a bell from side to side, revealing each ankle in turn. Her skirts are so full and so light that that they look as if they might float away like a balloon, carrying off the mannequin in front of our astonished gaze.[p.17 , my translation]

This fast-moving gait was best served by fluid dresses in soft fabrics such as wool jersey – the material selected by Gabrielle Chanel for her debut collections of sportswear.

Fashion fabrics, October 1915

Posted in Fashion, Fashion in World War I | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fashion in World War I: September 1915

Ensembles by Martial and Armand, Le Style Parisien, September 1915

In September 2015, Le Style Parisien showcased styles for the coming winter season by leading Paris couturiers, with detailed description of gowns and accessories. More interesting than these were the accompanying meditations  on the current state of the French fashion industry. The main fashion feature was cast as a letter from ‘Francine’, an imagined Parisienne, writing to a friend in New York. Her wish to give ‘the greatest number possible of pretty outfits so that people there can see clearly that French fashion is continuing as usual’ is a clear statement of the key purpose of Le Style Parisien.

Another article in this issue, ostensibly reporting on trends in millinery, instead focusses on the sorry state of the French trade, ‘a kind of anarchy which will ruin a part of the most important branch of French industry’. It expresses outrage that established specialists in design, construction and trimming are being undermined by upstart stylists who produce their designs in-house in order to cut costs. Consumers are also blamed for this cheapening of French design, as they are now wearing the same cheap hats summer and winter rather than shopping for new styles to complement each season’s fashions. This situation is exacerbated by the predatory behaviour of

our neighbours and allies, the English. Their incredible understanding of trade and of how it should be conducted, gave them a needle-sharp view of this point which was weakening in us. Even in wartime, and to Paris, they sent negotiators authorised to make huge deals, in order to transfer the power that was so recently ours to London.

Against this triple threat the writer has no practical defences, only the vain hope of:

A decision to decree Fashion in a co-ordinated way, and not to submit to the constantly changing music-hall fantasies of a style which derives only from the more or less outrageous taste of the woman who wears it.

This view of fashion as the preserve of a privileged elite, directed by French tastemakers, underlies an interview with Jean Worth, director of the House of Worth, quoted in the article by ‘Francine’.  He is asked about his decision to promote a silhouette with a nipped-in waist that would require a new style of corset, gives the rationale that:

Fashion has taken on a too relaxed form in recent times; all women, from duchesses to shopgirls, walk around muffled up in an English officer’s raincoat, even in the afternoon; that this will be the death of the industry and of couture; that everything must be done to avoid this kind of vulgarisation and that the first step is to design fitted dresses, since they are much more difficult to make than other kinds, and are much more attractive and distinguished

This passage is refreshing in its frankness about the economic motivation for introducing a style that would be hard for mass manufacturers to copy, and hard for non-elite consumers to wear. But it is also revealing of the disdain of couturiers for the priorities of consumers, an attitude which posed more of a threat to their trade than any number of British rivals.

Dark coloured fashion fabrics in Le Style Parisien, September 1915

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fashion in World War I: August 1915

Silk day dresses, Plate III, Le Style Parisien no 1

In August 1915, war had been raging for a year, and had created deep-seated economic and social changes even for non-combatants. In both Britain and France, the social season which had provided a rationale for fashion consumption by the elite was curtailed by restrictions on travel and by the closure of places of entertainment. Daytime events such as tea parties and matinee concerts had largely replaced dining out and evenings at the opera, removing some of the need for formal evening clothes. Daytime clothing had also been simplified to reflect the absence of servants – chaffeurs and maids – whose work had underpinned the elite lifestyle.

In these circumstances, the luxury trades, and especially Parisian couture, were severely challenged. But couture was too important both economically and symbolically to be allowed to fail. Accordingly, the Syndicat de Defense de la Grande Couture Française et des Industries s’y rattachant launched a new monthly publication called le Style Parisien in July 1915. This was aimed both at the couture client and at fashion retailers, and was available in an English edition sold in London and New York through Conde Nast, the publishers of Vogue. The first issue contained several rationales for the importance of fashionable clothing, even in wartime. One was economic, with multiple French businesses, from dye manufacturers and silk works to sewing workshops, linked to the fashion trade and suffering from wartime disruption to clothing exports. However this rationale could also be used to justify buying mass-produced clothing, which had become increasingly important since 1900, particularly for the tailored daywear that was a mainstay of wartime wardrobes.

The other rationale was more interesting, as it characterised the French couturier not as the head of a business enterprise but as a fine artist and an adept psychologist who helped his clients to present their individual selves. The couturier was described as an expert in world art, able to combine elements seen in his travels, his museum visits, and his reading, to create garments which were as different from the styles mass-produced by manufacturers as ‘the centuries-old chateau with the patina of age is from a little suburban villa’. The designs of great couturiers were seen as combining inventiveness with a refined understanding of aesthetic  standards that ensured their success.

Notwithstanding these claims of fashion as a form of art, le Style Parisien accepted that even the most dedicated clients were having to restrict their consumption of fashion. There was a stress on multifunctional designs, with couture garments that could be made up in different fabric combinations by retailers who had purchased a toile. Precise details of suitable fabrics by Bianchini-Ferier and other manufacturers were also given to encourage sales of French silks. For individuals not able to travel to Paris to place orders, there were cutting diagrams for the latest styles; the effect of these would depend on the skill of the dressmaker.

Striped silk fabrics recommended for making up dresses in Plate III, Le Style Parisien no 1


Posted in Fashion, Fashion in World War I | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment